ComplAIRequest a working session

SOLUTIONS

Start with the decision your program must support.

ATO and CMMC are different jobs. ComplAI keeps those differences clear, and still lets you reuse facts you have already verified.

Federal systems · Defense Industrial Base · connected assurance

PROGRAM PATHS

Two primary workflows, routed clearly.

ATO teams authorize systems. CMMC assessors evaluate implementation against a defined boundary. Each page explains the job without mixing those roles.

FEDERAL SYSTEMS

ATO & continuous ATO

Keep the authorization basis tied to the boundary, evidence, SSP, POA&M, and who reviews it.

Explore ATO workflows DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BASE

CMMC Level 2

Connect the CUI boundary and NIST SP 800-171 requirements to implementation, evidence, and the work that follows.

Explore CMMC workflows

MULTI-FRAMEWORK ASSURANCE

Reuse verified facts without flattening the requirements.

A control or evidence item can inform more than one program. Each requirement still keeps its own source, meaning, and review state.

  1. 01

    Map one fact to every relevant requirement in scope.

  2. 02

    Keep each framework’s language, owners, and evidence expectations.

  3. 03

    Show gaps and conflicts instead of hiding them behind one score.

  4. 04

    Confirm catalog versions and mapping depth during scoping.

DELIVERY MODEL

Give every contributor a clear role.

Customers, advisors, service teams, partners, assessors, and authorities do different work. ComplAI gives them a shared record. Each party keeps its own job.

CUSTOMER

Own the program and decisions

You set scope, assign work, accept risk, and own the authorization or assessment process.

DELIVERY

Contribute within a defined scope

Advisors and service teams help implement, operate, and gather evidence. They are not the assessor or the authority.

INDEPENDENT REVIEW

Keep assessment and authorization independent

Assessors and designated officials make the calls assigned to them. The platform does not.

NEXT DECISION

Choose the workflow, then define the boundary.

We’ll start with the program, who is responsible, and what has to be proven next.

Discuss your program path